|
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
=172; =90; ?> | ||||||
| Register | FAQ | Forum Rules | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
New Member
![]() 43
- 50
|
Xnormal has given me the best results in the past. I've only tried Maya's version a few times but like you said, it always left something to be desired. Xnormal's a good tool to have regardless.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to neenerpants For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
New Member
![]() 23
- 2
|
Oh man, I'm still working on the normals... didn't had much time the last days to do anything, I guess I wont be able to finish this one...
![]() anyway, I learned some things so I guess it was worth the try ![]() @ neenerpants: Thanks for the info, XNormal gives me better results than the Maya tool ^^. I also tried MeshMapper which also gives decent results. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks | |||
Digg
|
del.icio.us
|
StumbleUpon
|
Google
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |